Prognostic value of radical cystoprostatectomy in men with bladder cancer infiltrating prostate versus co-existing prostate cancer: a research study
© Bryniarski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 1 March 2010
Accepted: 22 September 2010
Published: 22 September 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fernando Pablo Secin|
|7 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Thomas|
|16 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arnulf Stenzl|
|16 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Piotr Bryniarski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Thomas|
|5 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arnulf Stenzl|
|29 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Piotr Bryniarski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Piotr Bryniarski|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Sep 2010||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-10-16|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.