Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Urethral catheters: can we reduce use?

  • Pieter J van den Broek1Email author,
  • Jan C Wille2,
  • Birgit HB van Benthem3,
  • Rom JM Perenboom4,
  • M Elske van den Akker-van Marle4, 5 and
  • Barbara S Niël-Weise6
BMC Urology201111:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-11-10

Received: 30 August 2010

Accepted: 23 May 2011

Published: 23 May 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Nicolle
15 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Stickler
2 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Kiri
31 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Kiri
22 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Stickler
5 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Nicolle
20 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek
Resubmission - Version 5
20 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 May 2011 Editorially accepted
23 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-11-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Infectious Diseases
(2)
Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement
(3)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. Centre for Infectious Disease Control
(4)
TNO Quality of Life. Department Innovation in Healthcare
(5)
Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Decision Making
(6)
Working Party Infection Prevention

Advertisement