Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Content validity and test-retest reliability of patient perception of intensity of urgency scale (PPIUS) for overactive bladder

  • Sherilyn M Notte1,
  • Thomas S Marshall2,
  • Misun Lee3,
  • Zalmai Hakimi4,
  • Isaac Odeyemi5,
  • Wen-Hung Chen1Email author and
  • Dennis A Revicki1
BMC Urology201212:26

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-26

Received: 11 June 2012

Accepted: 29 August 2012

Published: 7 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Wen-Hung Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Sountoulides
17 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Berardinelli
16 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Wen-Hung Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-12-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
United BioSource Corporation
(2)
Astellas Pharma US
(3)
Astellas Pharma Global Development
(4)
Astellas Pharma Global Development
(5)
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Lovett House

Advertisement