Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Unusual stent after ureteral substitution. A first case

  • Girolamo Fiorini1,
  • Giorgio Pomara1Email author,
  • Francesca Manassero1,
  • Andrea Mogorovich1,
  • Lorenzo Faggioni2 and
  • Cesare Selli1
BMC Urology201212:34

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-34

Received: 7 July 2012

Accepted: 27 November 2012

Published: 29 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thorsten H. Ecke
26 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evangelos Liatsikos
21 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Giorgio Pomara
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-12-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, University of Pisa
(2)
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa

Advertisement