Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for septic shock in patients receiving emergency drainage for acute pyelonephritis with upper urinary tract calculi

  • Yoshiyuki Yamamoto1,
  • Kazutoshi Fujita1Email author,
  • Shigeaki Nakazawa1,
  • Takuji Hayashi1,
  • Go Tanigawa1,
  • Ryoichi Imamura1,
  • Masahiro Hosomi1,
  • Daiki Wada2,
  • Satoshi Fujimi2 and
  • Seiji Yamaguchi1
BMC Urology201212:4

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-4

Received: 3 September 2011

Accepted: 13 March 2012

Published: 13 March 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marco Grande
1 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-12-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology, Osaka General Medical Center
Department of Emergency, Osaka General Medical Center