Identifying the quality of life effects of urinary incontinence with depression in an Australian population
© Avery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 June 2011
Accepted: 13 February 2013
Published: 16 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Wagg|
|25 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nancy Fultz|
|26 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steinar Hunskaar|
|4 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Jodie Avery|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nancy Fultz|
|4 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steinar Hunskaar|
|22 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jodie Avery|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|17 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jodie Avery|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|17 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-13-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.