Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data
© Smither et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 08 June 2006
Accepted: 05 February 2007
Published: 05 February 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Flavio Trigo Rocha|
|22 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giacomo Novara|
|3 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - katherine Moore|
|6 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - giulio nicita|
|10 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Viraj Master|
|7 Nov 2006||Author responded||Author comments - michael guralnick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Nov 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - katherine Moore|
|14 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - michael guralnick|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - michael guralnick|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Feb 2007||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-7-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.