Sutureless prepuceplasty with wound healing by second intention: An alternative surgical approach in children's phimosis treatment
© Efstratios; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 10 September 2007
Accepted: 04 March 2008
Published: 04 March 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Sep 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Zampieri|
|28 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Rauchenwald|
|27 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Efstratios Christianakis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Zampieri|
|1 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Rauchenwald|
|31 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Efstratios Christianakis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Mar 2008||Editorially accepted|
|4 Mar 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-8-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.