Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The susceptibility to fosfomycin of Gram-negative bacteria isolates from urinary tract infection in the Czech Republic: data from a unicentric study

  • Miroslav Fajfr1, 2Email author,
  • Miroslav Louda2, 3,
  • Pavla Paterová1, 2,
  • Lenka Ryšková1, 2,
  • Jaroslav Pacovský2, 3,
  • Josef Košina2, 3,
  • Helena Žemličková1, 2 and
  • Miloš Broďák2, 3
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:33

DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0222-6

Received: 10 September 2015

Accepted: 16 April 2017

Published: 26 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - T Demir
5 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Miroslav Fajfr
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
16 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0222-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové
(2)
Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralové
(3)
Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové

Advertisement