Qualitative insights into how men with low-risk prostate cancer choosing active surveillance negotiate stress and uncertainty
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 March 2016
Accepted: 1 May 2017
Published: 8 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Gotto|
|3 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniele Bianchi|
|21 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Miller|
|20 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Emily Mader|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Emily Mader|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0225-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.