Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Dose escalation improves therapeutic outcome: post hoc analysis of data from a 12-week, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group trial of trospium chloride in patients with urinary urge incontinence

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
12 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Claudia Neumeister
Resubmission - Version 2
12 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - H. Henry Lai
12 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - D R Staskin
12 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Claudia Neumeister
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Claudia Neumeister
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Claudia Neumeister
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
14 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-10-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement