Skip to main content

Table 3 Prospective studies of frequency of complications in studies of child circumcision undertaken by medical providers

From: Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review

Author

Country

Years

Setting

N

Age

Provider

Method

Indication

Follow-up period

Frequency of adverse eventsa

Frequency of serious adverse eventsb

Ahmed [43, 59]

Comoros Islands

1997-1998

Home

3824

2-8 years

Surgical aids, nurses & midwifes

Dorsal slit

Routine

11 days

2.3%

0.5%

Aldemir [48]

Turkey

2006

Hospital

200

2-9 years

Urologist

65% Smart clamp

35% Dissection

Routine

6 weeks

5%

1%

Bazmamoun [45]

Iran

2006-2007

Hospital

394

Mean 9 months

Surgeon

Sleeve

Routine

6 months

7-10%c

0%

Griffiths [49]

England

1985

Hospital

99

Mean 4.3 years

-

Dissection

85% medical

11% religious

4% other

3-5 weeks

6.4%d

2.8%e

Ozdemir [46]

Turkey

1990s

Mass circ. in hospital

700

8 days to puberty

-

Forceps guided

Routine

3 months

8%f

0%

Schmitz [51]

Holland

1997

Health centre

94

Median 3 years

GP residents under supervision of a surgeon

Freehand

Religious

1 week

12%

0%

Schmitz [50]

Malaysia

2001

Community

64

Median 10 years

Medical assistants supervised by doctors

TaraKlamp

Routine

6 weeks

1.6%

0%

Sharma [44]

India

2003

Hospital

15

2-25 years

Surgeons

Dorsal slit

Medical or religious

90 days

13.3%

0%

Sorensen [52]

Denmark

1981-1983

Hospital

43

Mean 6.5 years (range 1-13)

Surgeon (early stage in training)

Plastibell

Medical

Mean 29 months

Immediate postoperative (reported) 9.3%g

Late complications (reported) 0%h

0%

Subramaniam [47]

Singapore

-

Hospital

152

Mean 7 years

Surgeon

CO2 laser

Not given

-

4.6%

0.7%

  1. a Cases of minor bleeding stopped with simple pressure or 'conservative management' and excessive foreskin/inadequate circumcision are not included
  2. b Includes complications defined as 'serious' or 'severe' by authors, or with long-term or life-threatening sequalae (partial amputation of glans, urethral laceration, need for re-surgery or plastic surgery)
  3. c 13 boys had meatal stenosis and 26 had infection. It is not clear whether there is overlap between these two groups.
  4. d Defined by the authors as any admission to hospital or further surgery.
  5. e Acute re-admissions to hospital
  6. f Includes 15 cases of inadequate circumcision, since these were accompanied by secondary phimosis
  7. g One case of haemorrhage that stopped spontanesouly, 2 cases of erythema and pus with no confirmed infection or antibiotic treatment and 24 cases of dysuria due to irritation of the meatus due to the presences of a Plastibell excluded
  8. h Seven cases of slight irritation of the glans excluded