Skip to main content

Table 9 Summary of previous studies comparing mean radiological and mean pathological renal tumor sizes.

From: Discrepancy between radiological and pathological size of renal masses

Author Year N Mean CT size (mm) ‡ Mean Path size (mm) Mean δ (mm) P value
Herr[35] 1999 50 N/A N/A 6.3 0.001
Herr et al[34] 2001 87 34 27 7.4 N/A
Irani[33] † 2001 100 70.0 60.0 10.0 0.005
Yaycioglu[32] 2002 291 54 53 1.0 0.17
Schlomer[31] 2006 133 44.7 41.4 3.3 0.35
Kanofsky[30] 2006 198 51.1 49.2 1.9 N/A
Mistry[29] 2008 106 49.9 47.4 2.5 0.70
Kurta[28] 2008 521 47.9 46.9 1.0 0.02
Alicioglu[27] 2009 35 75.0 62.5 12.5 0.452
Ates[26] 2010 86 63.3 64.3 -1.0 0.342
Choi[25] 2010 175 49.8 45.5 4.3 0.152
Lee[24] 2010 467 45.6 44.9 0.7 0.399
Jeffery 2010 157 58.3 55.2 3.1 0.012
  1. † Used median CT size and median pathological size.
  2. ‡ mm = millimetres