Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

From: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is a feasible option in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

References

Period of NHT* (months)

No. of patients

Transfusion rate (%)

PSM** rate (%)

BCR*** rate after 2 years (%)

Rassweiler et al. [14]

 NHT group

NA

42

46.0

NA

NA

 non-NHT group

-

138

NA

NA

NA

Gregori et al. [15]

 NHT group

less than 3

21

NA

NA

NA

 non-NHT group

-

59

NA

NA

NA

Brown et al. [7]

 NHT group

less than 3

5

0

0

NA

 non-NHT group

-

60

1.7

17.0

NA

Maldonado-Valadez et al. [16]

 NHT group

3.5

50

36.0

18.0

NA

 non-NHT group

-

50

52.0

16.0

NA

Pu et al. [6]

 NHT group

3

25

32.0

12.0

NA

 

8

19

31.2

10.5

NA

 non-NHT group

-

11

36.4

45.5

NA

Our series

 NHT group

3 or less

47

2.12

27.7

27.7

 

more than 3

25

4.00

28.0

4.00

 non-NHT group

-

270

1.48

42.2

17.8

  1. Reviews of the impact of NHT prior to LRP on operative and postoperative parameters.
  2. NHT*: neoadjuvant hormonal therapy PSM**: positive surgical margin BCR***: biochemical recurrence.
  3. NA: not available PSM: positive surgical margin BCR: biochemical recurrence.