Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sequential compression devices in postoperative urologic patients: an observational trial and survey study on the influence of patient and hospital factors on compliance

  • David F Ritsema1,
  • Jennifer M Watson2,
  • Amanda P Stiteler1 and
  • Mike M Nguyen3Email author
BMC Urology201313:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-20

Received: 4 February 2013

Accepted: 5 April 2013

Published: 11 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sima Porten
28 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Reese
3 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Mike Nguyen
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
5 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-13-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Urology, The University of Arizona
(2)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona
(3)
Department of Urology, The University of Southern California

Advertisement