Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of baseline quality of life measures between renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing partial versus radical nephrectomy

  • Michelle L Arnold1,
  • David D Thiel2,
  • Nancy Diehl1,
  • Kevin J Wu3,
  • Steve Ames4 and
  • Alexander S Parker1Email author
BMC Urology201313:52

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-52

Received: 26 July 2013

Accepted: 11 October 2013

Published: 22 October 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Parker
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Parker
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Oct 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-13-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Sciences Research
(2)
Department of Urology
(3)
Department of Anatomic Pathology
(4)
Department of Medicine at Mayo Clinic

Advertisement