This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Urological research in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective cohort study of abstracts presented at the Nigerian association of urological surgeons conferences
© Bello; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 March 2013
Accepted: 13 November 2013
Published: 14 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jibril Oyekunle Bello|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - rollin laetitia|
|31 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marco De Sio|
|10 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jibril Oyekunle Bello|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-13-59|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.