Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of postoperative urinary incontinence and erectile function following RP (erectile function based on the IIEF-5 score; patients with IIEF-score of 5 or greater only)

From: Comparison of surgical technique (Open vs. Laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy

 

Surgical technique

 
 

RRP

LRP

p-value*

Pads/day (mean ± SD)

0.6 ± 1.0

0.6 ± 0.9

0.872

Pad categories/day (%)

  

0.889

 No incontinence (0-1 pads)

99/119 (83.2)

96/116 (82.8)

 

 Mild incontinence (2-3pads)

17/119 (14.3)

18/116 (15.5)

 

 Severe incontinence (3 pads)

3/119 (2.5)

2/116 (1.7)

 

 ICIQ-sum score (mean ± SD)

5.6 ± 4.6

5.3 ± 4.7

0.661

ICIQ incontinence categories (%)

  

0.071

  None

26/126 (20.6)

37/122 (30.3)

 

  Mild

47/126 (37.3)

28/122 (23.0)

 

  Moderate

36/126 (28.6)

41/122 (33.6)

 

  Severe

17/126 (13.5)

16/122 (13.1)

 
 

RRP

LRP

p-value*

 

Unilateral and bilateral NSRP

 

IIEF-score (mean ± SD)

13.3 ± 6.6

11.4 ± 6.7

0.151

IIEF erectile dysfunction categories (%)

  

0.230

  No ED

(22-25)

11/62 (17.7)

2/25 (8.0)

 

  Mild

(17-21)

7/62 (11.3)

5/25 (20.0)

 

  Mild-moderate

(12-16)

15/62 (24.2)

3/25 (12.0)

 

  Moderate

(8-11)

11/62 (17.7)

3/25 (12.0)

 

  Severe

(5-7)

18/62 (29.0)

12/25 (48.0)

 
  1. *Indicates test for comparison among the two age cohorts. All tests are chi-squared, unless stated otherwise.
  2. MW: Mann –Whitney-U-Test.