Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate analysis: optimal Cox proportional hazard models for two-sided and three-sided stratifications

From: A combined index to classify prognostic comorbidity in candidates for radical prostatectomy

Optimal model, 2-sided stratifications

Category

Hazard ratio

95% confidence interval

p

Age (per year)

1.06

1.04-1.08

<0.0001

Gleason score 8+

2.25

1.74-2.90

<0.0001

pN1

1.70

1.24-2.34

0.0010

ASA 3

1.58

1.17-2.12

0.0030

Charlson score 2+

1.71

1.27-2.30

0.0004

Body mass index 30+ kg/m2

1.47

1.10-1.95

0.0080

Optimal model, 3-sided stratifications

Category

Hazard ratio

95% confidence interval

p

Age (per year)

1.06

1.03-1.08

<0.0001

Gleason score 7

1.07

0.80-1.43

0.6641

Gleason score 8+

2.21

1.63-3.00

<0.0001

ASA 2

1.84

1.10-3.07

0.0202

ASA 3

2.69

1.50-4.83

0.0009

Charlson score 1

1.24

0.93-1.66

0.1412

Charlson score 2+

1.79

1.29-2.47

0.0004

pT3-4 and pN0

1.07

0.81-1.42

0.6420

pN1

1.85

1.30-2.62

0.0006

Body mass index 30–34.9 kg/m2

1.37

1.02-1.84

0.0385

Body mass index 35+ kg/m2

1.95

0.94-4.02

0.0718

  1. Reference categories were other patients in the case of two-sided comparisons and the lowest risk category when two-sided comparisons were used.