Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics

From: Association between the hemodialysis adequacy and sexual dysfunction in chronic renal failure: a preliminary study

 

Controls (n = 36)

Adequate HD (n = 18)

Non-adequate HD (n = 19)

P value

Age (years)

48.19 ± 6.94

47.89 ± 6.82

47.53 ± 6.39

0.671

Height (cm)

155.65 ± 5.46

155.61 ± 4.07

155.741 ± 4.50

0.978

Weight [24]

58.84 ± 7.27

56.11 ± 9.46

54.18 ± 5.76

0.052

Body mass index (kg/m2)

24.31 ± 3.02

23.08 ± 3.26

22.37 ± 2.60

0.036*

Educational level

   

0.321

Middle school or less

8 (22.2%)

3 (16.6%)

3 (15.7%)

 

High school

10 (27.7%)

10 (55.5%)

9 (47.3%)

 

College or more

18 (50.0%)

5 (27.7%)

7 (36.8%)

 

Monthly income (won)

   

0.072

<1 million

7 (19.4%)

6 (33.3%)

7 (36.8%)

 

1-3 million

19 (52.7%)

7 (38.8%)

8 (42.1%)

 

>3 million

10 (27.7%)

5 (27.7%)

4 (21.0%)

 

Menopause (%)

10 (27.7%)

13 (66.5%)

12 (63.1%)

0.023**

Hematocrit (%)

29.8

28.1

28.3

0.057

Testosterone (ng/ml)

1.25 ± 2.25

0.45 ± 0.06

0.26 ± 0.08

0.027*

Estradiol (pg/ml)

80.93 ± 77.24

27.55 ± 20.82

34.68 ± 55.69

0.003*

Duration of HD (years)

 

7.4 ± 6.99

8.5 ± 3.99

0.781

Onset of CRF

 

10.5 ± 5.29

11.5 ± 6.72

0.574

Average single-pool Kt/V

 

1.47 ± 0.11

1.14 ± 0.05

0.021***

  1. HD, hemodialysis, CRF, chronic renal failure. *analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test; **analyzed by Fisher’s exact test; ***analyzed by Mann Whitney test. Control versus adequate HD, Control versus non-adequate HD.