Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic factors for recurrence-free and overall survival after adrenalectomy for metastatic carcinoma: a retrospective cohort pilot study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - yasushi nakai
13 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satoshi Anai
18 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Won Tae Kim
6 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Eu Chang Hwang
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Pagano
10 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Eu Chang Hwang
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Eu Chang Hwang
Resubmission - Version 4
7 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Eu Chang Hwang
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 May 2014 Editorially accepted
23 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-14-41

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement