This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Disease-specific outcomes of Radical Prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time
- Sigve Andersen†1, 2Email author,
- Elin Richardsen†3, 4,
- Yngve Nordby1, 5,
- Nora Ness3,
- Øystein Størkersen6,
- Khalid Al-Shibli7,
- Tom Donnem1, 2,
- Helena Bertilsson8, 9,
- Lill-Tove Busund3, 4,
- Anders Angelsen8, 9 and
- Roy M Bremnes1, 2
© Andersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 6 November 2013
Accepted: 28 May 2014
Published: 14 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Røder|
|14 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Hanzly|
|24 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sigve Andersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sigve Andersen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-14-49|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.