This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Black and White men younger than 50 years of age demonstrate similar outcomes after radical prostatectomy
© Moses et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 August 2014
Accepted: 1 December 2014
Published: 11 December 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Aug 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Aug 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Moses|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Aug 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Sep 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heinric Williams|
|6 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zachary Klaassen|
|30 Oct 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Moses|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Oct 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kelvin Moses|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 Dec 2014||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2490-14-98|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.