Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masahiro Hiraoka
17 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yehezkel Waisman
24 Nov 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paulo Nogueira
28 Jan 2004 Author responded Author comments - Walter Devillé
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jan 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Feb 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yehezkel Waisman
27 Apr 2004 Author responded Author comments - Walter Devillé
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Apr 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 May 2004 Author responded Author comments - Walter Devillé
Resubmission - Version 4
25 May 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 May 2004 Author responded Author comments - Walter Devillé
Resubmission - Version 6
28 May 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Jun 2004 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2490-4-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement