Open Peer Review Reports for: Normal kidney size and its influencing factors - a 64-slice MDCT study of 1.040 asymptomatic patients
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ahmet Tuncay Turgut |
| 22 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Salih Ozgocmen |
| 28 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bum Soon Choi |
| 29 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Musturay Karcaaltinca |
| 21 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Johannes Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 8 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bum Soon Choi |
| 14 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ahmet Tuncay Turgut |
| 5 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Johannes Petersen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 5 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-9-19 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
