From: Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists
General pathologist diagnosis | Urological pathologist diagnosis | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NM | ASAP | HGPIN | 5 | 6 | 3 + 4 | 4 + 3 | 8–10 | Overall | |
NM | 84 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
ASAP | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
HGPIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
3 + 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 0 | |
4 + 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | |
8–10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
85 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 148 | |
% Exact concordance | 98.8 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 87.5 | 75.0 | 70.6 | 75.0 | 89.9 |
% Undergrading by UPD vs GPD | 8.3 | 25.0 | 17.6 | 25.0 | 16.4 | ||||
% Overgrading by UPD vs GPD | 4.2 | 0 | 11.8 | 0 | 4.9 |