Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The potential utility of non-invasive imaging to monitor restoration of bladder structure and function following subtotal cystectomy (STC)

  • David Burmeister1,
  • Bimjhana Bishwokarma1,
  • Tamer AbouShwareb1,
  • John Olson3,
  • Maja Herco1,
  • Josh Tan3,
  • Karl-Erik Andersson1 and
  • George Christ1, 2Email author
BMC Urology201515:103

Received: 26 June 2015

Accepted: 25 September 2015

Published: 14 October 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Jun 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hazem Orabi
20 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhamshid Okhunov
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Sep 2015 Editorially accepted
14 Oct 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12894-015-0094-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA
Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, and Laboratory of Regenerative Therapeutics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
Wake Forest Department of Biomolecular Imaging, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, USA