This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study
© Kim et al. 2015
Received: 14 July 2015
Accepted: 30 November 2015
Published: 9 December 2015
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri|
|5 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Kallidonis|
|21 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Chae Hong Lim|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Chae Hong Lim|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Nov 2015||Editorially accepted|
|9 Dec 2015||Article published||10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.