Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study

  • Dae Ji Kim1,
  • Jeong Hwan Son1Email author,
  • Seok Heun Jang1,
  • Jae Won Lee1,
  • Dae Sung Cho1 and
  • Chae Hong Lim1
BMC Urology201515:121

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6

Received: 14 July 2015

Accepted: 30 November 2015

Published: 9 December 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri
5 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Kallidonis
21 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Chae Hong Lim
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Chae Hong Lim
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Nov 2015 Editorially accepted
9 Dec 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital

Advertisement