This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Female urinary incontinence and wellbeing: results from a multi-national survey
© Smith. 2016
Received: 13 January 2016
Accepted: 16 May 2016
Published: 23 May 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jan 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jodie Avery|
|6 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J Dekker|
|19 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J Dekker|
|6 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|23 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0140-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.