This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Pure retroperitoneal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments: a safety and feasibility study in a porcine model
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 10 October 2015
Accepted: 31 May 2016
Published: 11 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - R. Autorino|
|15 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiury Andrade|
|13 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Dechao Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Dechao Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Dechao Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0145-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.