Skip to main content

Table 1 Selected studies pooling 205 patients for systematic review and meta-analysis and display of main patient characteristics

From: Pazopanib as a second-line treatment for non-cytokine-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the effect of treatment

First author

Year publ.

Setting

N

Gender, % men

Age, median (range)

Clear cell type, %

Previous nephrectomy

Poor risk percent

First-line targeted therapy

PRR

DCR

PFS (months)

Xie

2015

Phase II

85

72 %

63 (41–85)

100 %

81 %

24.4 %a

sunitinib

15.3 % (11.2–23.9 %)

70.6 %

5.6 (4.1–6.7)

Hainsworth

2013

Phase II

55

76 %

60 (41–82)

100 %

89 %

29 %b

sunitinib (N = 39) or bevacizumab (N = 16)

27 % (?-?)

76 %

7.5 (5.4–9.4)

Sanchez

2013

Retrospective

32

65 %

NA

81 %

74 %

28.3 %c

sunitinib

NA

NA

13 (9.0–17.0)

Matrana

2013

Retrospective

17

69 %

65 (45–83)

100 %

89 %

34 % (MSKCC)

sunitinib

NA

NA

3.5 (1.0–15.5)

Rautiola

2013

Retrospective

14

61 %

65 (40–82)

90 %

90 %

19 %c

sunitinib

43 %

77 %

11 (4.6–15.6)

Al-Marrawi

2013

Retrospective

14

NA

50 (44–78)

92 %

90 %

17 %c

VEGF inhibitord

0 % (0/2)e

NA

NA

  1. DCR disease control rate, mo months, MSKCC Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk category, NA data not available, N number of patients, PFS progression-free survival, PRR partial response rate
  2. aInternational Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model
  3. bMotzer risk category
  4. cHeng risk category
  5. dEither one of sunitinib, sorafenib, or bevacizumab
  6. eDenominator based on the availability of tumor response information