This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Spontaneous ureteric rupture, a reality or a faux pas?
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 5 March 2016
Accepted: 21 June 2016
Published: 7 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simone Albisinni|
|8 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniele Bianchi|
|10 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hamdy Aboutaleb|
|11 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Gaurav Aggarwal|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simone Albisinni|
|13 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniele Bianchi|
|17 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hamdy Aboutaleb|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0158-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.