This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Patient preferences for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan: a discrete-choice experiment
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 13 April 2016
Accepted: 21 October 2016
Published: 4 November 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pranav Sharma|
|23 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Gotto|
|6 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Miller|
|12 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroji Uemura|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Miller|
|2 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Gotto|
|26 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroji Uemura|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|4 Nov 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0182-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.