Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Combination therapy only shows short-term superiority over monotherapy on ureteral stent-related symptoms – outcome from a randomized controlled trial

  • Qinyu Liu1,
  • Banghua Liao1,
  • Ruochen Zhang1,
  • Tao Jin1,
  • Liang Zhou1,
  • Deyi Luo1,
  • Jiaming Liu1,
  • Hong Li1 and
  • Kunjie Wang1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:66

Received: 19 July 2016

Accepted: 7 November 2016

Published: 15 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12894-016-0186-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China