Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Protocol for a prospective, randomized study on neurophysiological assessment of lower urinary tract function in a healthy cohort

  • Stéphanie van der Lely1,
  • Martina Stefanovic1,
  • Melanie R. Schmidhalter1,
  • Marta Pittavino2,
  • Reinhard Furrer2,
  • Martina D. Liechti1,
  • Martin Schubert3,
  • Thomas M. Kessler1 and
  • Ulrich Mehnert1Email author
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0188-9

Received: 30 May 2016

Accepted: 10 November 2016

Published: 25 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
10 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
25 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12894-016-0188-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neuro-Urology, Spinal Cord Injury Center & Research, University of Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
(2)
Institute of Mathematics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
(3)
Neurophysiology, Spinal Cord Injury Center & Research, University of Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland

Advertisement