Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Developing a preoperative predictive model for ureteral length for ureteral stent insertion

  • 1, 3Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 2,
  • 1, 3,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4 and
  • 3
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0189-8

Received: 19 August 2016

Accepted: 22 November 2016

Published: 30 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
22 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
30 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12894-016-0189-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
(2)
Departments of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
(3)
Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
(4)
Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA

Advertisement