Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses

BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1

Received: 3 August 2016

Accepted: 7 December 2016

Published: 10 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexey Aksenov
8 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefania Musco
5 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carla Rognoni
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefania Musco
24 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carla Rognoni
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University
(2)
Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University

Advertisement