This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 3 August 2016
Accepted: 7 December 2016
Published: 10 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexey Aksenov|
|8 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefania Musco|
|5 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Carla Rognoni|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stefania Musco|
|24 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Carla Rognoni|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.