This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do men regret prostate biopsy: Results from the PiCTure study
- Catherine Coyle1Email author,
- Eileen Morgan2,
- Frances J. Drummond3, 4,
- Linda Sharp†3, 5 and
- Anna Gavin†2
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 March 2016
Accepted: 22 December 2016
Published: 26 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca O'Malley|
|16 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Ristau|
|7 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Coyle|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Ristau|
|21 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca O'Malley|
|22 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Coyle|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-016-0194-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.