- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Multicystic nephroma masquerading as hydatid cyst: a diagnostic challenge
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 May 2016
Accepted: 7 March 2017
Published: 11 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Friedlander|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Picken|
|27 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Abdelmoneim Kheir|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Abdelmoneim Kheir|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0208-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.