Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Urology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients

  • A. W. Postema1Email author,
  • M. J. V. Scheltema1,
  • C. K. Mannaerts1,
  • R. J. G. Van Sloun2,
  • T. Idzenga1,
  • M. Mischi2,
  • M. R. E. Engelbrecht3,
  • J. J. M. C. H. De la Rosette1 and
  • H. Wijkstra1, 2
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:27

Received: 8 September 2016

Accepted: 22 March 2017

Published: 5 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Arnoud Postema
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital
Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology
Department of Radiology, AMC University Hospital