Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Real life persistence rate with antimuscarinic treatment in patients with idiopathic or neurogenic overactive bladder: a prospective cohort study with solifenacin

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniele Bianchi
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yigit Akin
22 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Marloes Tijnagel
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniele Bianchi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marloes Tijnagel
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0216-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement