This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Clinical relevance of aortic calcification in urolithiasis patients
- Toshikazu Tanaka1,
- Shingo Hatakeyama1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Hayato Yamamoto1,
- Takuma Narita1,
- Itsuto Hamano1,
- Teppei Matsumoto1,
- Osamu Soma1,
- Yuki Tobisawa1,
- Tohru Yoneyama2,
- Takahiro Yoneyama1,
- Yasuhiro Hashimoto2,
- Takuya Koie1,
- Ippei Takahashi4,
- Shigeyuki Nakaji4,
- Yuriko Terayama3,
- Tomihisa Funyu3 and
- Chikara Ohyama1, 2
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 11 July 2016
Accepted: 27 March 2017
Published: 4 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takahiro Yasui|
|11 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Konrad Wilhelm|
|17 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Toshikazu Tanaka|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Toshikazu Tanaka|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0218-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.