Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A retrospective study of treatment persistence and adherence to α-blocker plus antimuscarinic combination therapies, in men with LUTS/BPH in the Netherlands

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luca Cindolo
24 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Sountoulides
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marcus Drake
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luca Cindolo
2 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Sountoulides
20 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marcus Drake
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marcus Drake
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 May 2017 Editorially accepted
22 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0226-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement