This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing health-related quality of life in urology – a survey of 4500 German urologists
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 December 2016
Accepted: 10 June 2017
Published: 19 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Lenherr|
|23 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nithin Theckumparampil|
|24 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pietro Castellan|
|30 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anton Schmick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anton Schmick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0235-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.