Skip to main content

Table 2 Attitudes towards HRQOL assessment

From: Assessing health-related quality of life in urology – a survey of 4500 German urologists

Clinical Importance

 

Not important

Important

 

Absolutely not important

Slightly important

Fairly important

Very important

More or less important

 Is HRQOL assessment important for clinical work?

% (N)

0.3 (5)

2.0 (29)

44.8 (659)

41.7 (614)

11.2 (165) [9.6–12.8]

%

2.3 [1.5–3.1]

86.5 [84.7–88.3]

 Perception of HRQOL

 

Disagree

Agree

 

Absolutely disagree

Slightly disagree

Fairly agree

Absolutely agree

Cannot estimate

 To me HRQOL is a vague term.

% (N)

0.6 (9)

5.4 (84)

29.2 (453)

64.0 (992)

0.7 (11) [0.3–1.1]

%

6.0 [4.8–7.2]

93.3 [92.1–94.5]

 The difference between HRQOL assessment and symptom rating is not apparent.

% (N)

55.1 (849)

32.4 (499)

8.0 (123)

2.7 (42)

1.9 (29) [1.2–2.6]

%

87.4 [85.7–89.1]

10.7 [9.2–12.2]

 I regard HRQOL assessment as not suitable for daily use.

% (N)

15.7 (243)

46.4 (717)

28.1 (435)

5.5 (85)

4.3 (66) [3.3–5.3]

%

62.1 [59.7–64.5]

33.6 [31.2–36.0]

Integrity of HRQOL

 HRQOL assessments are valuable in patient consultations.

% (N)

0.5 (8)

3.3 (51)

23.6 (366)

71.2 (1.103)

1.4 (22) [0.8–2.0]

%

3.8 [2.8–4.8]

94.8 [93.7–95.9]

HRQOL assessments are valuable in therapy follow-ups.

% (N)

0.9 (14)

2.8 (43)

24.2 (375)

71.2 (1.106)

0.9 (14) [0.4–1.4]

%

3.7 [2.8–4.6]

95.4 [94.4–96.4]

 Verbal HRQOL assessment is generally sufficient.

% (N)

5.9 (92)

37.7 (585)

36.1 (559)

19.1 (296)

1.2 (18) [0.7–1.7]

%

43.6 [41.1–46.1]

55.2 [52.7–57.7]

 Validated HRQOL instruments are useful for HRQOL assessment.

% (N)

2.7 (42)

21.7 (337)

32.9 (511)

39.5 (613)

3.2 (50) [2.3–4.1]

%

24.4 [22.3–26.5]

72.4 [70.2–74.6]

Barriers for HRQOL assessment

 My patients do not accept HRQOL questionnaires.

% (N)

36.0 (558)

43.6 (675)

10.0 (155)

2.7 (41)

7.7 (120)

[6.4–9.0]

%

79.6 [77.6–81.6]

12.7 [11.0–14.4]

 I prefer not to pay for HRQOL questionnaires.

% (N)

5.0 (77)

5.8 (90)

13.1 (203)

64.1 (989)

12.0 (185) [10.4–13.6]

%

10.8 [9.3–12.3]

77.2 [75.1–79.3]

 The effort is too extensive to assess HRQOL in clinical routine.

% (N)

10.4 (161)

37.7 (585)

34.7 (538)

16.2 (251)

1.0 (16)

[0.5–1.5]

%

48.1 [45.6–50.6]

50.9 [48.4–53.4]

 HRQOL questionnaires are disadvantageous due to their length.

% (N)

4.2 (66)

23.5 (363)

36.8 (569)

15.5 (240)

20.0 (309)

[18.0–22.0]

%

27.7 [25.5–29.9]

52.3 [49.8–54.8]

 HRQOL questionnaires are disadvantageous due to the complexity of their interpretation.

% (N)

5.2 (81)

25.0 (386)

34.2 (528)

13.9 (214)

21.7 (335) [19.6–23.8]

%

30.2 [27.9–32.5]

48.1 [45.6–50.6]

 I am not sufficiently trained to assess HRQOL.

% (N)

39.7 (617)

46.5 (722)

9.6 (149)

1.9 (29)

2.3 (36) [1.6–3.0]

%

86.2 [84.5–87.9]

11.5 [9.9–13.1]

 I cannot invoice HRQOL assessment due to a missing number in the medical-fee schedule.

% (N)

6.9 (105)

5.5 (84)

8.0 (122)

40.7 (619)

38.9 (593) [36.5–41.3]

%

12.4 [10.7–14.1]

48.7 [46.2–51.2]

  1. % = composite score in percent
  2. […] = 95% CI