Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - R. Lombardo
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio Pastore
6 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yunyan Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yunyan Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yunyan Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement