This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial
- Yunyan Wang†1,
- Bing Zhong†1,
- Xiaosong Yang†1,
- Gongcheng Wang1,
- Peijin Hou1 and
- Junsong Meng1Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 December 2016
Accepted: 12 June 2017
Published: 29 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - R. Lombardo|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Pastore|
|6 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yunyan Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yunyan Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yunyan Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.