Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Polypoid arteriovenous malformation of the ureter mimicking a fibroepithelial polyp, a case report

  • C.S. ten Donkelaar1Email author,
  • A.C. Houwert1,
  • F.J.W. ten Kate1 and
  • M.T.W.T. Lock1
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0237-z

Received: 3 January 2017

Accepted: 19 June 2017

Published: 10 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Cocci
27 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessandro Calarco
29 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Celine ten Donkelaar
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Celine ten Donkelaar
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Celine ten Donkelaar
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12894-017-0237-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Advertisement