This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Impact of a protein-based assay that predicts prostate cancer aggressiveness on urologists’ recommendations for active treatment or active surveillance: a randomized clinical utility trial
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 July 2016
Accepted: 27 June 2017
Published: 3 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Filson|
|7 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Tosoian|
|12 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - John Peabody|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Filson|
|29 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Tosoian|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0243-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.