This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 April 2017
Accepted: 18 July 2017
Published: 27 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Filippo Maria Turri|
|8 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mino Rizzo|
|19 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tommy Kjærgaard Nielsen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tommy Kjærgaard Nielsen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.