This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 May 2016
Accepted: 24 August 2017
Published: 2 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Okyaz Eminaga|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Warick J. Delprado|
|2 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ashwin Sachdeva|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Okyaz Eminaga|
|13 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Warick J. Delprado|
|23 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ashwin Sachdeva|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.